ABSTRACT
Strongyloides stercoralis is a soil-transmitted helminth endemic to tropical and subtropical regions and can be acquired due to parasite penetration through the skin. It can remain dormant in the gastrointestinal system for decades after the primary infection. In immunocompromised patients, this parasite can cause autoinfection with progression to hyperinfection syndrome. Here we report a unique case of pulmonary strongyloidiasis in a 32-year-old female, originally from Guatemala, with a significant clinical history of Philadelphia chromosome-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia diagnosed in 2019. The patient is status post chemotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus hyper-CVAD regimen (Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine sulfate, Doxorubicin hydrochloride (Adriamycin), and Dexamethasone). History of drug-induced hyperglycemia and obesity was also noted. Her current chief complaint included dyspnea, tachycardia, and chest pain. Chest computerized tomography (CT) scan showed diffuse interstitial pulmonary edema with septal thickening, scattered ground-glass opacities, and small pericardial effusion. Due to normal ejection fraction, the differential diagnosis included non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, pneumonitis secondary to chemotoxicity, and infection. She rapidly progressed to acute hypoxic respiratory failure, and a bronchoalveolar lavage study revealed numerous larvae consistent with Strongyloides hyperinfection. Further workup revealed eosinophilia with negative Strongyloides IgG antibody. Given the rarity of this infection in the United States and the patient's place of birth, acquired latent Strongyloides infection is favored as the initial source of infection. The reactivation of the infection process was most likely secondary to her chemotherapy treatment. Strongyloides hyperinfection diagnosis can be challenging to establish and entails a high level of suspicion. Cytology evaluation is an essential factor for diagnosis.
ABSTRACT
Testing for SARS-CoV-2 has become a critical component for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays are currently the predominate method for testing. Quality control (QC) measures utilize known positive and known negative controls to ensure the adequacy of extraction and RT-PCR steps but do not evaluate all components of testing. We have conducted a quality assurance review of our RT-PCR testing for COVID-19 to determine the rate of false positive results in asymptomatic patients and causes for these errors. DESIGN: We have developed a quality control procedure in which all specimens from asymptomatic unexposed persons with SARS-CoV-2 positive tests were retested. When a second test was "non-detected" a third test was performed and a root cause analysis of the erroneous result undertaken. RESULTS: In the study period, 24,717 samples were tested and 6251 were from asymptomatic patients. Of the 288 initial positive tests, 20 (6.9%) were negative on retesting. Review of cycle threshold curves, technologists' records, location of specimen on testing plates and relationships with high viral load specimens was undertaken. Analysis revealed technologists' errors (misplacement of specimen in testing plate or contamination) and cross contamination from high viral load specimens in adjacent wells of testing plates were common causes for false positive results. DISCUSSION: SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing is associated with a small number of false positive results, most easily recognized in asymptomatic non-exposed patients. Implementation of a limited retesting protocol identifies clinically significant testing errors and allows review and improvement of laboratory procedures.